Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 12 (2024)</span>Volume 12 (2024)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 11 (2023)</span>Volume 11 (2023)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 10 (2022)</span>Volume 10 (2022)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 9 (2021)</span>Volume 9 (2021)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 8 (2020)</span>Volume 8 (2020)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 7 (2019)</span>Volume 7 (2019)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 6 (2018)</span>Volume 6 (2018)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 5 (2017)</span>Volume 5 (2017)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 4 (2016)</span>Volume 4 (2016)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 3 (2015)</span>Volume 3 (2015)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 2 (2014)</span>Volume 2 (2014)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 1 (2013)</span>Volume 1 (2013)
World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2014, 2(6), 267-271
DOI: 10.12691/WJAR-2-6-3
Original Research

Performance Evaluation and Path Analysis Studies in Tomato (Solanumlycopersiconl.) Genotpes under Humera, Northern Ethiopia Condition

Shushay Chernet1, , Derbew Belew2 and Fetien Abay3

1Humera Agricultural Research Center, Tigray Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box 62, Humera, Ethiopia

2Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, P. O. Box 307, Jimma, Ethiopia

3Department of Crop and Horticultural Sciences, Mekelle University, P.O. Box 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia

Pub. Date: November 12, 2014

Cite this paper

Shushay Chernet, Derbew Belew and Fetien Abay. Performance Evaluation and Path Analysis Studies in Tomato (Solanumlycopersiconl.) Genotpes under Humera, Northern Ethiopia Condition. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2014; 2(6):267-271. doi: 10.12691/WJAR-2-6-3

Abstract

In order to evaluate performance of genotypes and study the direct and indirect effects of characters on fruit yield, thirty six tomato genotypes introduced from different countries were grown at Humera Agricultural Research Center during 2010/11 cropping season under irrigation condition. The trial was laid out in 6 x 6 simple lattice design in two replications. The maximum marketable yield was obtained from the genotype CLN-2037-A (49.20 tons ha-1) and the minimum with H-1350 (3.00 tons ha-1). Estimates of genotypic direct and indirect effects of various characters on fruit yield showed that number of matured fruits plant-1 (0.798) and average weight of fruits plant-1 (0.644) had highest positive direct contribution to fruit yield. This indicated direct selection based on these characters will improve fruit yield. On the contrary, fruit set percentage (-0.447) and fruit polar diameter (-0.392) exerted highest negative direct effect on fruit yield ha-1.

Keywords

tomato, genotypes, path analysis, direct effect, indirect effect

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Dewey, D.R. and Lu,K.H, “A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production,” Agronomy Journal, 51, 515-518,1959.
 
[2]  Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO),An assessment of the agricultural production base, technological packages and innovation and intervention strategies for commercial farmers in Kafta- Humeraworeda of Tigray Regional State, Addis Ababa. 2002.
 
[3]  FAOSTAT, Statistical Database of the Food and Agriculture of the United Nations. FAO, Rome, Italy. Available at http://faostat.fao.org.2011, Accessed on May 2011.
 
[4]  FAOSTAT, Statistical Database of the Food and Agriculture of the United Nations. FAO, Rome, Italy. Available at http://faostat.fao.org.2012, Accessed on June 2014.
 
[5]  Ghosh, K.P., Islam, A.K.M., Mian, M.A.K and Hossain, M.M, “Variability and character association in F2 segregating population of different commercial hybrids of tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.),” J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage, 14 (2), 91-95, 2010.
 
[6]  Hidayatullah, S.A., Jatoi, A.G. and Mahmood, T, “Path coefficient analysis of yield component in tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum),” Pak. J. Bot., 40 (2), 627-635, 2008.
 
[7]  Islam, B.M.R., Ivy, N.A., Rasul, M.G. and Zakaria, M, “Character Association and path analysis of exotic tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.) genotypes,” Bagladesh J. Pl. Breed. Genet., 23 (1), 13-18, 2010.
 
[8]  Jiregna, T.D, “Evaluation of agronomic performance and Lycopene variation in tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.) genotypes in Mizan, Southern Ethiopia.” World Applied Sciences Journal, 27 (11), 1450-1454, 2013
 
[9]  Lemma, D, Tomatoes Research Experience and Production Prospects, Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, Research Report No. 43, Addis Ababa. pp. 1-15. 2002.
 
[10]  Mehta, M. and Asati, B.S, “Genetic relationship of growth and development traits with fruit yield in tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill),”Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 21 (1), 92-96, 2008.
 
[11]  Meseret, D.R., Ali, M. and Kassahun, B, “Evaluation of tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.) genotypesfor yield and yield components,” Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, Global science books, 2012.
 
[12]  MoARD, Crop variety register: Animal and plant health regulatory directorate. Issue No. 12. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 145 p, 2009.
 
[13]  Montogomery, D.C, Design and and Analysis of experiments (6th ed.), John Willey and sons Inc., USA, pp 97-103, 2005.
 
[14]  Muhammad, Y.S., Muhammed, A. and Qumer, I, “Augmented analysis for yield and some yield components in tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.),” Pak. J. Bot., 45 (1), 215-218, 2013.
 
[15]  Naika, S., Jeude, J.V.L., Goffa, M., Hilmi, M. and Van Dam, B, Cultivation of tomato, 4th edition, Agrodok- series No. 17, Agromisa Foundation and CTA, Wageningen. pp. 4-10.2005.
 
[16]  Pradeepkumar, T., Bastian. D.M.J., Radhakrishnan, N.V. and Aipe, K.C, “Genetic variation in tomato for yield and resistance to bacterial wilt,” Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 39, 157-158, 2001.
 
[17]  Reddy, B.R., Reddy, P.R., Reddy, S.D. and Begum, H, “Correlation and path analysis studies for yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.),”IOSR Journal of Agriculture and veterinary science, volume 4, issue 4, pp 56-59, Jul-Aug. 2013.
 
[18]  SAS Institute Inc, Statistical analysis Software version 9.2, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. USA, 2008.
 
[19]  Samonte, S.O., Wilson,L.T., and McMClig, A.M, “Path analysis of yield and yield related traits of fifteen diverse rice genotypes,” Crop Science, 38: 1130-1136, 1998.
 
[20]  Shashikanth, Basavaraj, N., Hosamani, R.M. and Patil, B.C, “Genetic variability in tomato (Solanumlycopersicon [Mill]. Wettsd.),” Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23 (3), 536-537, 2010.
 
[21]  Syed, J.H., Khalid.M.K., Tarik, M., Hashim Laghari, M. and Masud, M, “Yield potential of some exotic and local tomato cultivars grown for summer production,” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 4 (10), 1215-1216, 2001.
 
[22]  Tanuja, B., Manish, K.S. and Thakur, K.S, “Genetic diversity and path analysis in tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.),” Vegetable Science, 39 (2), 221-223, 2012.
 
[23]  Tiwari, J.K. and Upadhyay, D, “Correlation and path-coefficient studies in tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.),”Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2 (1), 63-68, 2011.