Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 12 (2024)</span>Volume 12 (2024)
Issue 1, Volume 12, 2024
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 11 (2023)</span>Volume 11 (2023)
Issue 4, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 3, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 2, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 1, Volume 11, 2023
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 10 (2022)</span>Volume 10 (2022)
Issue 4, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 3, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 2, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 1, Volume 10, 2022
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 9 (2021)</span>Volume 9 (2021)
Issue 3, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 2, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 1, Volume 9, 2021
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 8 (2020)</span>Volume 8 (2020)
Issue 4, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 3, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 2, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 1, Volume 8, 2020
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 7 (2019)</span>Volume 7 (2019)
Issue 4, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 3, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 2, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 1, Volume 7, 2019
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 6 (2018)</span>Volume 6 (2018)
Issue 4, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 3, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 2, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 1, Volume 6, 2018
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 5 (2017)</span>Volume 5 (2017)
Issue 6, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 5, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 4, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 3, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 2, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 1, Volume 5, 2017
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 4 (2016)</span>Volume 4 (2016)
Issue 6, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 5, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 4, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 3, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 2, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 1, Volume 4, 2016
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 3 (2015)</span>Volume 3 (2015)
Issue 6, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 5, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 4, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 3, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 2, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 1, Volume 3, 2015
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 2 (2014)</span>Volume 2 (2014)
Issue 6A, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 6, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 5, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 4, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 3, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 2, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 1, Volume 2, 2014
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 1 (2013)</span>Volume 1 (2013)
Issue 6, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 5, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 4, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 3, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 2, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 1, Volume 1, 2013
World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2020, 8(2), 57-61
DOI: 10.12691/WJAR-8-2-6
Original Research

Response of Selected Tall Hybrid Coffea arabica Varieties to N, P and K Nutrients in Tanzania

Suzana Mbwambo1, , Godsteven Maro1 and Emmanuel Nkya1

1Tanzania Coffee Research Institute, P.O. Box 3004, Moshi, Tanzania

Pub. Date: May 26, 2020

Cite this paper

Suzana Mbwambo, Godsteven Maro and Emmanuel Nkya. Response of Selected Tall Hybrid Coffea arabica Varieties to N, P and K Nutrients in Tanzania. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2020; 8(2):57-61. doi: 10.12691/WJAR-8-2-6

Abstract

The growth and yield response of some of TaCRI’s improved tall Coffea arabica hybrids to applied N, P and K were assessed in this work; since, in addition to resistance to CBD and CLR, they are also high yielding (up to 3 t ha-1 against 1.5 t ha-1 of the traditional varieties) and assumed also to be highly nutrient demanding. A split plot RCBD was applied with three replications, five coffee varieties (N39-8, N39-9, N39-11, N39-12 and KP 423 old variety check) as main factors and 4 fertilizer rates (75, 112.5 and 150 g tree-1, together with 37.5g + 10 kg of FYM) as sub factors. Each rate was applied three times per year except FYM which was applied once in two years. Data on canopy width, stem girth, number of bearing primaries, plant height, berry clusters and yields were collected and subjected to ANOVA using Statistica V7 software with means separated using Fisher LSD method at α = 0.05. Variety KP 423 showed a significantly (p<0.05) wider canopy and more berry clusters than the test varieties. N39-8 excelled in number of branches, stem girth and tree height. It also gave higher yield (1894 kg clean coffee ha-1) which was significantly different (p<0.05) from other varieties. Plant height, stem girth and yield response to the fertilizer options showed an asymptotic relationship with the turning point at 112.5 g tree-1. Interaction between Variety N39-8 and 37.5g tree-1 + FYM resulted into significantly higher yield (2436 Kg clean coffee ha-1). It is tentatively concluded that the assumed high nutrient demand for the new varieties is unlikely, at least in the first four years. As such, 37.5g tree-1 of NPK (20:10:10) applied three times per year + 10 kg of FYM per tree applied once in two years; or 75g of NPK (20:10:10) per tree if applied three times per year is enough for the test varieties under this age.

Keywords

NPK nutrients, Farm Yard Manure (FYM), Coffea arabica, Tanzania

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Agrisystems (1998). The Coffee Sector Strategy Study for Tanzania: Report No. 3. Government of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 97pp.
 
[2]  Baffes, J and Gardner, B. (2003),The transmission of world commodity prices to domestic markets under policy reforms in developing countries, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 6, (3), 159-180.
 
[3]  Teri, J.M., Kilambo, D.L., Maro, G.P., Magesa, J.M and Van der Vossen HM (2011). Coffee Research for Development 2001-2011: A Decade of Contributing to a Profitable and Sustainable Coffee Industry in Tanzania. Tanzania Coffee Res. Institute, Moshi. 240 p.
 
[4]  Fitch, M.M.M., Moore, H.P., Leong, T.C.W, Akaishi, L.A.Y., Yeh, A.K.F., White, S.A., Dela A.S., Cruz, A.S.D., Santo, L.L., Ferreira, A.A and Poland, L.J. (2005). Clonally propagated and seed-derived Papaya Orchards: II. Yield comparison. Hortic. Sci. 40(5):1291-1297.
 
[5]  Satyanarayana, V., Prasad, P., Murthy, V and Boote, K. (2002). Influence of integrated use of farmyard manure, inorganic fertilizers on yield and yield components of irrigated lowland rice, J. Plant. Nutr., 25(10).
 
[6]  Wrigley, G. (1988).Coffee: Tropical Agriculture Series. Longman Scientific and Technical, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA. pp.1-60.
 
[7]  Maro, G. P., Monyo, H. E., Nkya, E. O. and Teri, J. M. (2006). The soil fertility status of coffee growing areas in Tanzania. In: Proceedings of ASIC, 21 September 2006, Montpellier Cedex, France. pp. 1419-1422.
 
[8]  Zafar, M., Abbasi, M.K., Khaliq, A and Rehman, Z. (2011). Effect of combining organic materials with inorganic phosphorous sources on growth, yield, energy content and phosphorous uptake in maize at Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan, Archives of Applied Research, 3(2), 199-212.
 
[9]  Oteng, J and Asuming-Brempong (2009). Integrated organic-inorganic fertilizer management for rice production on the vertisols of the Accra Plains of Ghana, W. Afric. J. App. Ecol., 16, 23-33.
 
[10]  Maro, G.P., Msanya, B.M. and Mrema, J.P. (2014). Soil fertility evaluation for coffee (Coffea arabica) in Hai and Lushoto Districts, Northern Tanzania. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science (IJPSS), 3 (8), pp.934-947.
 
[11]  Assis, G. A., Scalco, M.S., Guimaraes, R. J., Colombo, A., Dominghetti, A.W and Matos, N. (2014). Drip irrigation in coffee crop under different planting densities: Growth and yield in southeastern Brazil. Rev. Bras. De Engenharia Agric. Ambient. 8(11):116-11123.
 
[12]  Tefera, F., Alamerew, S and Wagery, D. (2016). Assessment of the growth and yield characters of some promising Arabica coffee hybrids under highland environments in Southwestern Ethiopia. J. American- Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 16(5): 917-923.
 
[13]  Esther, A.K and Adomako, B. (2010). Genetic and environmental correlations between bean yield and agronomic traits in Coffea canephora. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 2(4): 64-72.
 
[14]  Etienne, H and Betrand, B (2001). True-to-type and agronomic characteristics of Coffea Arabica trees micro propagated by the embryogenic cell suspension technique. Tree Physiol. 21: 1031-1038.
 
[15]  International Coffee Organization (ICO). (2011). World coffee trade conversions and statistics. [http://www .intracen.org/coffee guide/ world-coffee-trade/conversions-and-statistics] site visited on 20/7/2016.
 
[16]  Mengel, K., Kirkby, E.A., Kosegarten, H. and Appel, T. (2001). Principles of Plant Nutrition, 5th Edition. Springer Science and Business Media. BV. 807pp.
 
[17]  Hofman G. and Salomez, J. (2003). Chemical soil fertility management: Partim Fertility Management. Lecture notes, Fac. Agric & Appl. Biol. Sci., Ghent University. 55pp.
 
[18]  Lekasi, J., Tanner, .J., Kimani, S and Harris, P. (2001). Managing manure to sustain smallholder livelihoods in East African Highlands: DFID/NRSP/HYDRA.
 
[19]  Njoroge, J.M., Mwakha, E and Kimenia, J.K. (1990). Effect of planting hole sizes and farm yard manure rates on establishment of high density Arabica Coffee, Kenya Coffee, 55(640), 775-787.
 
[20]  Okalebo, J.R., Othieno, C.O., Woomer, P.L., Karanja, N.K, Semoka, J.M.R., Bekunda, M.A., Mugendi, D.N., Muasya, R.M., Bationo, A. and Mukhwana, E.J. (2007). Available technologies to replenish soil fertility in East Africa. In: Batiano, A. et al (eds). Advances in ISFM in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. TSBF-CIAT, Nairobi, Kenya. 45-62.
 
[21]  Kimani, S.K., Esilaba, A.O., Odera, M.M., Kimenye, L., Vanlauwe, B. and Bationo, A. 2007. Effects of organic and mineral sources of nutrients on maize yields in three districts of Central Kenya. In: A. Batiano et al (eds). Advances in ISFM in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, 2007. 353-357.