Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 12 (2024)</span>Volume 12 (2024)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 11 (2023)</span>Volume 11 (2023)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 10 (2022)</span>Volume 10 (2022)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 9 (2021)</span>Volume 9 (2021)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 8 (2020)</span>Volume 8 (2020)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 7 (2019)</span>Volume 7 (2019)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 6 (2018)</span>Volume 6 (2018)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 5 (2017)</span>Volume 5 (2017)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 4 (2016)</span>Volume 4 (2016)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 3 (2015)</span>Volume 3 (2015)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 2 (2014)</span>Volume 2 (2014)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 1 (2013)</span>Volume 1 (2013)
World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2017, 5(6), 284-291
DOI: 10.12691/WJAR-5-6-1
Original Research

Effects of Thiram and Carbendazim Application Rates on Growth and Grain Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Kenya

Kibe A.M1, Kirui K. R1, , Wagara I. N2 and Thagana M. W.3

1Department of Crops, Horticulture and Soils, Egerton University

2Department of Biological sciences, Egerton University

3Agric. & Sci Tech, Kenyatta University

Pub. Date: November 07, 2017

Cite this paper

Kibe A.M, Kirui K. R, Wagara I. N and Thagana M. W.. Effects of Thiram and Carbendazim Application Rates on Growth and Grain Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Kenya. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2017; 5(6):284-291. doi: 10.12691/WJAR-5-6-1

Abstract

Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris is a soil and seed borne disease affecting chickpea (Cicer arietinum). It is widely distributed where chickpea is grown and it causes variable yield losses depending on the level of resistance of the genotype and suitability of environmental conditions for disease development. Thiram and carbendazim fungicides are used in most crops as seed dress fungicides against a wide variety of pathogens. The impact of the 0%, 50%, 100% and 150% of the recommended 1.5g fungicide/kg seed rates of these two fungicides on plant height, periodic dry matter and number of pods and grain yield of chickpea was evaluated in the field in a split plot design. Two varieties, Chania 1 which is moderately resistant and Chania 2 which is highly susceptible were grown. Plant height, dry matter and pods per plant were significantly higher in Chania 1 moderately resistant variety and when grown under increasing rates of fungicide application. Increasing fungicide application rates significantly increased grain yield of chickpea. The highest Grain yield of 1.4 t/ha was obtained from 150% (2.25g/kg seed) application of either thiram or carbendazim for MR Chania 1 was grown and treated with either thiram or carbendazim at 150% rate of application. Farmers should grow Chania 1 chickpea variety to minimize use of fungicide application rates to range within 1.5 to 2.25 g fungicide/kg seed and obtain high chickpea growth; yield attributes and grain yields ranging between 1.32 to 1.4 t/ha, respectively.

Keywords

chickpea, fungicide treatment, growth and yield parameters

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Nielson, D.C. 2001. Production functions of chickpea, field pea, and lentil in the Central Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 93: 193-197.
 
[2]  Oweis, T., Hachum, A. and Pala, M. 2004. Water use efficiency of winter sown chickpea under supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Water resources management 66(2): 163-179.
 
[3]  Kamithi, D.K., Kibe A.M. and Akuja, T. 2008. Effect of Nitrogen and plant population on Dry matter production of Desi Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a dry land at Naivasha, Kenya. Egerton journal of Science and technology, 2008. Vol 8: 104-117.
 
[4]  Kibe, A.M. and Onyari, C.N. 2008. Production functions and their use in predicting chickpea biomass yields in Naivasha Kenya. Egerton journal of Science and technology, 2008(8); 88-103.
 
[5]  Kibe, A.M. and Kamithi, D.K. 2007. Production potential of Desi chickpea grown under various Nitrogen and plant population Densities at Naivasha Kenya. Medwel Journals. Agricultural 2 (4) 2007: 520-527.
 
[6]  Nene, Y.L., Reddy, M.V., Haware, M.P., Ghanekar, A.M. and Amin, K.S. 1991. Field Diagnosis of chickpea diseases and their control. ICRISAT. Information Bulletin no. 28.
 
[7]  Maitlo, S. A., Syed, R.N., Rustamani, M.A., Khuhro, R. D. and Lodhi, A.M. 2014. Comparative efficacy of different fungicides against Fusarium wilt of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pak. J. Bot., 46(6): 2305-2312, 2014.
 
[8]  Khan I. A., Alam, S.S. and Jabbar, A. 2004. Purification of Phytotoxin from culture filtrates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris and its biological effect on chickpea. Pak. J. Bot., 36 (4). 871-880.
 
[9]  Muhammad, A. A. 2010. Variability in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris for Chickpea Wilt resistance in Pakistan. Phd Thesis submitted to Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences. Pp. 61.
 
[10]  Navas-Cortes, J.A., Hau, B. and Jimenez-Diaz R. M. 2000. Yield Loss in Chickpea in Relation to Development of Fusarium Wilt Epidemics. Phytopathology 90: 1269-1278.
 
[11]  Kamdi, D.R., Mondhe M. K., Jadesha G., Kshirsagar D.N. and Thakur K.D. 2012. Efficacy of botanicals, bioagents and fungicides against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris in chickpea wilt sick plot. Scholars research library. Annals of Biological research, 2012, 3 (11): 5390-5392.
 
[12]  De, R.K., Chaudhary, R.G and Naimuddin, 1996. Comaparative efficacy of biocontrol agents and fungicides for controllling chickpea wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris. Indian J. Agric. Sciences., 66: 370-373
 
[13]  Singh, K., Singh, A.K. and Singh, R.P. 2004. Effect of fungicidal seed treatment on the fungi associated with chickpea. Annals of Plant-Protection-Sciences 2004, 12(2): 450-451.
 
[14]  Padwick, G.W. 1941. Report of the imperial mycologist. Sci. Rep. Agric. Res. Institute, New Dheli, Pp 94-101.
 
[15]  Catherine Swaboda and Palle Pedersen, 2009. Effect of Fungicide on Soybean Growth and Yield. Agronomy Journal. Vol. 101 (2). 352-356.
 
[16]  Mallu, T.S., Nyende, A.B., Ganga Rao, N.V.P.R., Odeny, D.A. and Mwangi, S.G. 2015. Assessment of Interrelationship among agronomic and yield characters of chickpea. International Journal of Agriculture and crop Sciences. IJACS/2015/8-2/128-135.
 
[17]  Haware, M.P and Nene Y.L. 1980. Sources of resistance to wilt and root rots of chickpea. Int. Chickpea Newsletter 3: 11-12.
 
[18]  Khalil A. Khanzada., Rajput M. Aslam., Shah G. Sarwar., Lodhi A. Mubeen and Farrakh Mehboob. 2002. Effect of seed dressing fungicides for the control of seed borne mycroflora of wheat. Asian Journal of Plant sciences, Vol 1, Number 4: 441-444. 2002.
 
[19]  Halila, M.H and Strange R.N. 1997. Screening of Kabuli chickpea germplasm for resistance to Fusarium wilt. Euphytica 96: 273-279, 1997.
 
[20]  Singh, D.K. and Jha, M.M. 2003. Effect of fungicidal treatment against chickpea wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris. Journal of Applied Biology 13 (1/2): 41-45.