Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 12 (2024)</span>Volume 12 (2024)
Issue 1, Volume 12, 2024
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 11 (2023)</span>Volume 11 (2023)
Issue 4, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 3, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 2, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 1, Volume 11, 2023
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 10 (2022)</span>Volume 10 (2022)
Issue 4, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 3, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 2, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 1, Volume 10, 2022
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 9 (2021)</span>Volume 9 (2021)
Issue 3, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 2, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 1, Volume 9, 2021
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 8 (2020)</span>Volume 8 (2020)
Issue 4, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 3, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 2, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 1, Volume 8, 2020
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 7 (2019)</span>Volume 7 (2019)
Issue 4, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 3, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 2, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 1, Volume 7, 2019
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 6 (2018)</span>Volume 6 (2018)
Issue 4, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 3, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 2, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 1, Volume 6, 2018
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 5 (2017)</span>Volume 5 (2017)
Issue 6, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 5, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 4, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 3, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 2, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 1, Volume 5, 2017
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 4 (2016)</span>Volume 4 (2016)
Issue 6, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 5, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 4, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 3, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 2, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 1, Volume 4, 2016
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 3 (2015)</span>Volume 3 (2015)
Issue 6, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 5, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 4, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 3, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 2, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 1, Volume 3, 2015
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 2 (2014)</span>Volume 2 (2014)
Issue 6A, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 6, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 5, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 4, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 3, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 2, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 1, Volume 2, 2014
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 1 (2013)</span>Volume 1 (2013)
Issue 6, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 5, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 4, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 3, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 2, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 1, Volume 1, 2013
World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2014, 2(5), 228-236
DOI: 10.12691/WJAR-2-5-5
Original Research

Sites Regression GGE Biplot Analysis of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes in three Contrasting Environments

Tamene T. Tolessa1, and Tadese S. Gela1

1Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, Asella, Ethiopia

Pub. Date: September 25, 2014

Cite this paper

Tamene T. Tolessa and Tadese S. Gela. Sites Regression GGE Biplot Analysis of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes in three Contrasting Environments. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2014; 2(5):228-236. doi: 10.12691/WJAR-2-5-5

Abstract

Fourteen haricot bean genotypes were evaluated at three contrasting environments in Ethiopia during 2007-2009 main cropping seasons. The objective of the study was to determine the magnitude and pattern of G × E interaction and yield stability, and to determine the best performing varieties for selection environments. The study was conducted using a randomized complete block design with 4 replications. G × E interaction and yield stability were estimated using the sites regression genotype plus G × E interaction biplot. Pooled analysis of variance for grain yield showed significant (p ≤ 0.001) differences among the genotypes, environments and for G × E interaction effects. This indicated that the genotypes differentially responded to the changes in the test environments or the test environments differentially discriminated the genotypes or both. Environment accounted for 50.2% of the total yield variation, genotype for 29.1% and G × E interaction for 18.3%, indicating the necessity for testing haricot bean varieties at multi-locations and over years. The first two multiplicative component terms sum of squares of the GGE biplot explained 85.76% of the interaction sum of squares. There were no single genotypes that showed generally superior performance across all the test environments but genotype 213-FOT-15 followed by other three better performing genotypes including 551-SEQ-1024, BAYOMADERO-75 and ZEBRA, were ranked first in 78% and 67% of the nine test environments, respectively and identified as stable based on GGE analysis. Generally, the application of sites regression GGE biplots facilitated the visual comparison and identification of superior genotypes, thereby supporting decisions on haricot bean variety selection and recommendation in different environments.

Keywords

G × E interaction, haricot bean, sites regression GGE biplot, yield stability

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Abeya, T., Chemeda, D., Girma, M., Dagnachew, L., Negash, G., “Regression and additive main effect and multiple interactions (AMMI) in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes,” Ethiopian Journal of Biological Science 7(1), 45-53, (2008).
 
[2]  Allard, R.W., Bradshaw, A.D., “Implication of genotype–environmental interaction in applied plant breeding,” Crop Science 5, 503-506, (1964).
 
[3]  Asfaw, A., Alemayehu, F., Gurmu, F., Atnaf. M., “AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analysis for matching varieties onto soybean production environments in Ethiopia,” Scientific Research and Essays, 4(11), 1322-1330, (2009).
 
[4]  Burgueno, J., Crossa, J., Vargas, M., “SAS Programs for graphing GE and GGE biplots,” CIMMYT, INT. Mexico, (2001). Available: http://www.cimmyt.org/biometrics/biplots.exe. [Accessed Sep., 2012].
 
[5]  Ceccarelli, S., “Wide adaptation: How wide?” Euphytica 40, 197-205, (1989).
 
[6]  Central Statistical Authority (CSA), “Federal democratic republic of Ethiopia, agricultural samples survey, Report on area and production of major crops 3, 2013, p251.
 
[7]  Crossa, J., “Statistical analysis of multi-location trials,” Advances in Agronomy, 44, 55-85, (1990).
 
[8]  Crossa, J, Cornelius, P.L., Yan, W., “Biplots linear-bilinear model for studying cross over genotype x environment interaction,” Crop Science, 42(2), 619-633, (2002).
 
[9]  Dawit, T., Wuletaw, T., Muluken, B., “Genotype x environment interactions and grain yield stability of haricot bean varieties in Northwest Ethiopia,” Scientific Research and Essays, 7(41), 3487-3493, (2012).
 
[10]  Dehghani, H., Ebadi, A., Yousefi, A., “Biplot analysis of genotype x environment interaction for barley yield in Iran,” Agronomy Journal, 98, 388-398, (2006).
 
[11]  Ethiopian Mapping Authority (EMA), National Atlas of Ethiopia, Ethiopian Mapping Authority, Addis Ababa, (1988).
 
[12]  Falconer, R.D., Mackay, Trudy F.C., Introduction to quantitative genetics, (4th Ed). Longman, Group limited, Malaysia, (1996).
 
[13]  Ferreira, D.F., Demetrio, C.G.B., Manly, B.F.J., Machado, A.A., Vencovsky, R., “Statistical model in agriculture: biometrical methods for evaluating phenotypic stability in plant breeding,” Cerne Lavras, 12 (4), 373-388, (2006).
 
[14]  Flores, F., Moreno, M.T., Cubero, J.J., “A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G x E interaction,” Field Crops Research, 56, 271-286, (1998).
 
[15]  Fox, P.N., Skovm, B., Thompson, B.K., Braun, H.J., Cormier, R., “Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale,” Euphytica, 47, 57-64, (1990).
 
[16]  Gauch, H.G., “Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE,” Crop Science, 46, 1488-1500, (2006).
 
[17]  Hernandez, M.V., Crossa, J., “The AMMI analysis and graphing the biplot,” CIMMYT, INT. Mexico, (2000). Available: http://www.cimmyt.org/biometrics/biplots.exe. [Accessed, Sep., 2012].
 
[18]  Hintsa, G.H., Fetien, A., “AMMI and GGE Biplot analysis of bread wheat genotypes in the Northern part of Ethiopia,” Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 1, 12-18, (2013).
 
[19]  Hussein, M.A., Bjornstad, A., Aastveit, A.H., “SAS G X E STAB: A SAS Program for Computing Genotype X Environment Stability Statistics,” Agronomy Journal, 92(3), 454-459, (2000).
 
[20]  Navabi, A., Yang, R.C., Helm, J., Spawer, D.M., “Can spring wheat growing mega-environments in the northern great plain be dissected for representative locations or niche-adapted genotypes?” Crop Science, 46, 1107-1116, (2006).
 
[21]  Piepho, H.P., “Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems - a review,” Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 180, 193-213, (1998).
 
[22]  Reza M., Armon, M., Shabani, A., Daryaei, A., “Identification of Stability and Adaptability in Advanced Durum Genotypes Using AMMI Analysis,” Asian Journal of Plant Science, 6(8), 1261-1268, (2007).
 
[23]  Samonte, S.C.P.B., Wilson, L.T., McClung, A.M., Medley, J.C., “Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analysis,” Crop Science, 45, 2414-2424, (2005).
 
[24]  SAS., System Analysis Software. Version 9.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA, 2002.
 
[25]  Setegn, G., Habtu, A., “Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis of seed yield in navy bean genotypes,” African Crop Science Journal, 11(1), 1-7, (2003.
 
[26]  Tolessa, T.T., Keneni, G., Sefera, T., Jarso, M., Bekele, Y., “Genotype x Environment Interaction and Performance Stability for Grain Yield in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes,” International Journal of Plant Breeding, 7(2), 116-123, (2013).
 
[27]  Teshale, A., Habtu, A., Paul, K., “Development of improved Haricot bean germplasm for the mid- and low- altitude sub-humid agro-ecologies of Ethiopia,” In: Kemal Ali, Gemechu, K., Seid, A., Malhotra, R., Beniwal, S., Makkouk, K., Halila, M.H. (eds.). Food and forage Legumes of Ethiopian: Progress and prospects. Proceedings of a workshop on food and forage Legumes, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, 87-94, (2006).
 
[28]  Tsedeke, A., Arega, D.A., David, B., Bekele, Sh., Said, S., Alastair, O., Solomon, A., “Tropical Grain Legumes in Africa and South Asia, Knowledge and Opportunities,” Tropical Legume II Project Research Report 1, p116, (2011).
 
[29]  Van Eeubwijk, F.A., Denis, J.B., Kang, M.S., “Incorporate Additional Information on Genotypes and Environments in Models for Two-way Genotype-by-Environment Tables,” In: Kang, M.S., Gauch, H.G. (eds.), Genotype-by-Environment Interaction, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 15-49, (1996).
 
[30]  Voltas, J., Van, E.F., Igartua, E., García, del., Moral, L.F., Molina-Cano, J.L., Romagosa, I., “Genotype by environment interaction and adaptation in barley breeding: Basic concepts and methods of analysis,” In: Slafer, G.A., Molina-Cano, J.L., Savin, R., Araus, J.L., Romagosa, I. (eds.) Barley Science: Recent Advances from Molecular Biology to Agronomy of Yield and Quality, The Harworth Press Inc., New York, 205-241, (2002).
 
[31]  Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Q., Szlavnics, Z., “Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot,” Crop Science, 40, 597-605, (2000).
 
[32]  Yan, W., “GGE Biplot: A Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data,” Agronomy Journal, 93, 1111-1118, (2001).
 
[33]  Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., “Interpretation of genotype x environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario,” Crop Science, 41, 19-25, (2001).
 
[34]  Yan, W., Cornelius, P.L., Crossa, J., Hunt, L.A., “Two types of GGE Biplots for analyzing multi-environment trail data,” Crop Science, 41, 656-663, (2001).
 
[35]  Yan, W., “Singular value partitioning in biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data,” Agronomy Journal, 94, 990-996, (2002).
 
[36]  Yan, W., Rajcan, I., “Biplots analysis of the test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario,” Crop Science, 42, 11-20, (2002).
 
[37]  Yan, W., Kang, M.S., GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists and Agronomists, (1st Edn), CRC Press LLC, Boca Roton, Florida, (2003).
 
[38]  Yan, W., Tinker, N.A., “Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86, 623-645, (2006).
 
[39]  Yan, W., Kang, M.S., Ma, B., Wood, S., Cornelius, P.L., “GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data,” Crop Science, 47, 643-655, (2007).
 
[40]  Yan, W, “GGE Biplot vs. AMMI Graphs for Genotype-by-Environment Data Analysis,” Journal of Indian Society Agricultural Statistics, 65(2), 181-193, (2011).
 
[41]  Zerihun, J., “GGE-biplot Analysis of Multi-environment Yield Trials of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes in Southeastern Ethiopia Highlands,” International Journal of Plant Breeding Genetics, 5(1), 59-75, (2011).
 
[42]  Zobel, R.W., Wright, M.S., Gauch, H.G., “Statistical analysis of a yield trial,” Agronomy Journal, 80, 388-393, (1988).