Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 12 (2024)</span>Volume 12 (2024)
Issue 1, Volume 12, 2024
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 11 (2023)</span>Volume 11 (2023)
Issue 4, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 3, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 2, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 1, Volume 11, 2023
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 10 (2022)</span>Volume 10 (2022)
Issue 4, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 3, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 2, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 1, Volume 10, 2022
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 9 (2021)</span>Volume 9 (2021)
Issue 3, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 2, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 1, Volume 9, 2021
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 8 (2020)</span>Volume 8 (2020)
Issue 4, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 3, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 2, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 1, Volume 8, 2020
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 7 (2019)</span>Volume 7 (2019)
Issue 4, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 3, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 2, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 1, Volume 7, 2019
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 6 (2018)</span>Volume 6 (2018)
Issue 4, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 3, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 2, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 1, Volume 6, 2018
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 5 (2017)</span>Volume 5 (2017)
Issue 6, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 5, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 4, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 3, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 2, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 1, Volume 5, 2017
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 4 (2016)</span>Volume 4 (2016)
Issue 6, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 5, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 4, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 3, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 2, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 1, Volume 4, 2016
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 3 (2015)</span>Volume 3 (2015)
Issue 6, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 5, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 4, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 3, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 2, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 1, Volume 3, 2015
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 2 (2014)</span>Volume 2 (2014)
Issue 6A, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 6, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 5, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 4, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 3, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 2, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 1, Volume 2, 2014
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 1 (2013)</span>Volume 1 (2013)
Issue 6, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 5, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 4, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 3, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 2, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 1, Volume 1, 2013
World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2023, 11(2), 54-58
DOI: 10.12691/WJAR-11-2-3
Original Research

Functional Properties and Physicochemical Composition of Different Leaf Positions of Soft and Firm Flesh Trees of Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. (Moraceae)

M.A.S.P.K. Mudugamuwa1, R.M. Dharmadasa2, and D.C. Abeysinghe1

1Department of Plantation Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Plantation Management, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makandura, Gonawila (NWP), 60170, Sri Lanka

2Industrial Technology Institute, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo, 00700, Sri Lanka

Pub. Date: July 11, 2023

Cite this paper

M.A.S.P.K. Mudugamuwa, R.M. Dharmadasa and D.C. Abeysinghe. Functional Properties and Physicochemical Composition of Different Leaf Positions of Soft and Firm Flesh Trees of Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. (Moraceae). World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2023; 11(2):54-58. doi: 10.12691/WJAR-11-2-3

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to determine the functional properties and physicochemical composition of different leaf positions (Leaf bud, first leaf, second leaf, third leaf and fourth leaf) of soft (Wela) and firm (Waraka) flesh trees of jackfruit. Physicochemical composition, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC.) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were determined using the official AOAC method, Folin-Ciocalteu method, colourimetric method and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay respectively. Among the leaf bud and leaf blades, significantly highest TPC, TFC, and TAC. were observed in the second leaf blade of the soft flesh type, whereas the significantly highest TPC, TFC. and TAC. were recorded in the first leaf blade of the firm flesh type. Among the leaf petioles, significantly highest TPC, TFC. and TAC were observed in the fourth petiole of the soft flesh type, whereas, in the firm flesh type, the second petiole had significantly highest TPC, TFC. and TAC. However, the soft flesh type had more bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity compared to the firm flesh type. Higher crude protein content was observed in leaf buds, whereas higher moisture and ash content were observed in leaf petioles in both types. According to the results, it could be concluded that all the tested leaf positions of both A. heterophyllous types contained significant amounts of TPC, TFC, and TAC, which can be effectively used for traditional or folk systems of medicine and pharmaceutical industries.

Keywords

Artocarpus heterophyllus, Firm and soft flesh, Functional properties, Leaf positions, Physicochemical composition

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Ranasinghe, R.A.S. and Marapana, R.A.U.J. (2019). Effect of maturity stage on physicochemical properties of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) flesh. World Journal of Dairy and Food Sciences, 14(1), 17-25.
 
[2]  Okonkwo, C.C., Agu, C.V., Njoku, O.U., Abonyi, U., Victor, A., Anaduaka, E.G., Iloabuchi, K.V. and Odo, C.E. (2015). Hypoglycaemic and haematinic properties of ethanol leaf extract of Artocarpus heterophyllus in alloxan induced diabetic rats. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines12(2), 144-148.
 
[3]  Karunarathne, S.I., Ranaweera, L.T., Daundasekera, D.M.K.C., Ananda, G.K.S., Kannangara, S.K., Ranathunga, A.P.D.T., Madhukalpani, O.V.S., Weebadde, C.K. and Sooriyapathirana, S.D.S.S. (2018). Assessment of the applicability of morphometric, organoleptic and phylogenetic analyses to differentiate soft and firm flesh bearing trees of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) in Sri Lanka. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Sri Lanka, 13, 200-218.
 
[4]  Haq, N. (2006). Jackfruit, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Southampton Centre for Underutilised Crops, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
 
[5]  Gupta, N., Jain, U.K. and Pathak, A.K. (2009).Wound healing properties of Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. Ancient Science of Life28(4), 36.
 
[6]  Bhat, V., Mutha, A. and Dsouza, M.R. (2017). Pharmacognostic and physiochemical studies of Artocarpus heterophyllus seeds. International Journal of Chem Tech Research10(9), 525-536.
 
[7]  Kurian, S., Joseph, L. and Josekumar, V.S. (2018). Phytochemical evaluation, GC-MS analysis and antimicrobial activity of the leaves petiole of Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology4(3), 280.
 
[8]  Farnsworth, N.R. (1966). Biological and phytochemical screening of plants. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences55(3), 225-276.
 
[9]  Abeysinghe, D.C., Li, X., Sun, C., Zhang, W., Zhou, C. and Chen, K. (2007). Bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacities in different edible tissues of citrus fruit of four species. Food Chemistry104(4), 1338-1344.
 
[10]  Liu, M., Li, X.Q., Weber, C., Lee, C.Y., Brown, J. and Liu, R.H. (2002). Antioxidant and anti-proliferative activities of raspberries. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 50(10), 2926-2930.
 
[11]  Benzie, I.F. and Strain, J.J. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FARP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FARP assay. Analytical Biochemistry, 239(1), 70-76.
 
[12]  Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.
 
[13]  Thapa, N., Thapa, P., Bhandari, J., Niraula, P., Shrestha, N. and Shrestha, B.G. (2016). Study of phytochemical, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Artocarpus heterophyllus. Nepal Journal of Biotechnology, 4(1), 47-53.
 
[14]  Amadi, J.A., Ihemeje, A. and Afam-Anene, O. C. (2018). Nutrient and phytochemical composition of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) pulp, seeds and leaves. International Journal of Innovative Food, Nutrition and Sustainable Agriculture6(3), 27-32.
 
[15]  Brion-Espinoza, I.A., Iniguez-Moreno, M., Ragazzo-Sanchez, J.A., Barros-Castillo, J.C., Calderon-Chiu, C. and Calderón-Santoyo, M. (2021). Edible pectin film added with peptides from jackfruit leaves obtained by high-hydrostatic pressure and pepsin hydrolysis. Food Chemistry: X, 12, 100170..